%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2014-08-25T10:41:56+10:00
2014-08-25T10:41:59+10:00
2014-08-25T10:41:59+10:00
Adobe InDesign CC (Macintosh)
uuid:f0adf207-51b0-a744-8fe7-ba39596456e7
adobe:docid:indd:99418633-34c2-11de-8e62-f88d0979ba4e
xmp.id:15a503c6-7b5d-4a96-b8be-3a23cd5915a3
proof:pdf
xmp.iid:8f1c1c9b-6150-4322-8f21-0e244bb66022
xmp.did:36d8d6d0-336b-4745-95c4-80873c203c17
adobe:docid:indd:99418633-34c2-11de-8e62-f88d0979ba4e
default
converted
from application/x-indesign to application/pdf
Adobe InDesign CC (Macintosh)
/
2014-08-25T10:41:56+10:00
application/pdf
Adobe PDF Library 10.0.1
False
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 807.874]/Type/Page>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC/ImageI]/Properties<>/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 807.874]/Type/Page>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/Properties<>/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 807.874]/Type/Page>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/Properties<>/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 807.874]/Type/Page>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 807.874]/Type/Page>>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
q
/GS0 gs
/Fm0 Do
Q
0 0 0 0 k
/GS0 gs
37.134 22.874 520.158 32.593 re
f*
BT
0 0 0 1 k
/GS1 gs
/T1_0 1 Tf
0.049 Tw 9 0 0 9 38.1339 48.0408 Tm
[(Acoustics Australia \
V)55(ol. 42, No. 2, August 2014 - 135)]TJ
ET
q
0 g
/GS0 gs
0 Tw /Fm1 Do
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
0.271 Tw 10 0 0 10 36.8504 758.4208 Tm
[([for example )0.7(29, 30] or by increasing )0.5(the overall )0.5(rate of )]TJ
0.085 Tw 0 -1.2 TD
[(stimulation )1.2(\(such as the )0.6(HiRes strategy )0.7(of )55.4(Advanced )0.5(Bionics )]TJ
0.246 Tw T*
[(or FSP)36.6( strategy )0.7(of Medel )0.5(devices\). )0.6(Unfortunately )0.8(none of )]TJ
0.238 Tw T*
[(those strategies )0.7(succeed )0.6(in bringing music )0.5(perception )0.8(to a )]TJ
0 Tw T*
(satisfactory level [6].)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 36.8504 687.0822 Tm
(CONCLUSIONS)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.02 Tc -0.068 Tw 10 0 0 10 51.0504 672.2476 Tm
[(Although the cochlear implant has restored the communication)-20( )]TJ
0.029 Tw -1.42 -1.2 Td
[(abilities )0.5(for )0.5(hundreds )0.5(of )0.5(thousands of )0.5(people around )0.5(the world, )0.5(it)-19.9( )]TJ
-0.013 Tw T*
[(has )0.5(short-comings )0.5(in )0.5(music )0.5(perception. )0.5(Given )0.5(the )0.5(complexity )0.5(and)-20( )]TJ
-0.052 Tw T*
[(very restricted size of the cochlea, no hearing device will be able to)-20( )]TJ
0.033 Tw T*
[(restore hearing )0.5(perfectly)64.9(, at )0.5(least )0.5(not with the )0.5(current )0.5(technology)64.9(.)-20( )]TJ
-0.041 Tw T*
[(It is natural that speech will be the primary focus while developing)-20( )]TJ
0.139 Tw T*
[(the cochlear implant. However)40(, a cochlear implant that will be)-19.9( )]TJ
/C2_0 1 Tf
0.02 Tw T*
[<004700480056004C004A0051004800470003>-30.7<0056005300480046004C00BF00460044004F004F005C0003>-30.7<0049005200550003>-30.6<005000580056004C00460003>-30.7<0053004800550046004800530057004C005200510003>-30.6<0050004C004A004B00570003>-30.7<004500480003>-30.7<0053005200560056004C0045004F0048000F0003>-30.7<004500580057>-19.8<0003>]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0 Tw T*
[(can be unfavourable to speech perception.)-20( )]TJ
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tc 12 0 0 12 36.8504 552.9089 Tm
(ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.03 Tc -0.02 Tw 10 0 0 10 51.0504 538.0743 Tm
[(The Bionics Institute acknowledges the support it receives from)-29.8( )]TJ
/C2_0 1 Tf
0.03 Tw -1.42 -1.2 Td
[<0057004B00480003>-178<0039>59.9<004C0046005700520055004C004400510003>-196.1<002A0052005900480055005100500048005100570003>-196<0057004B005500520058004A004B0003>-196<004C005700560003>-196.1<003200530048005500440057004C005200510044004F0003>-196<002C0051004900550044005600570055005800460057005800550048>-29.9<0003>]TJ
T*
[<00360058005300530052005500570003>-348.2<003300550052004A00550044005000110003>-348.2<0031004C0051004C00440003>-348.2<0036004C0050005200510003>-348.2<005A004400560003>-348.2<00BF0051004400510046004C0044004F004F005C0003>-348.2<0056005800530053005200550057004800470003>-348.2<0045005C>-30<0003>]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.326 Tw T*
[(a )0.6(scholarship )0.6(from )0.6(the )0.5(German )55.8(Academic )0.6(Exchange )0.6(Service.)-30( )]TJ
0.074 Tw T*
[(Portions of this material were published in the Proceedings of the)-29.8( )]TJ
0.05 Tw T*
[(12th )0.5(International )0.5(Conference )0.6(on )0.5(Music )0.6(Perception )0.5(and )0.5(Cognition)-30( )]TJ
-0.026 Tw T*
[(\(ICMPC\) and the 8th )18.3(T)35.3(riennial Conference of the European Society)-30( )]TJ
/C2_0 1 Tf
0.03 Tw T*
[<0049005200550003>-118.2<0057004B00480003>-118.3<00260052004A0051004C0057004C005900480003>-118.2<00360046004C004800510046004800560003>-118.3<005200490003>-118.2<003000580056004C00460003>-118.2<000B00280036002600320030000C001E0003>-118.2<002C00510051004800560010002500550052005A00510003>-118.2<002B000F>-30<0003>]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.006 Tw T*
[(Au )55.4(A, Stevens C, Schubert E & Marozeau J \(2012\). New music for)-29.9( )]TJ
0.047 Tw T*
[(the )0.6(Bionic )0.5(Ear: )55.7(An )0.5(assessment )0.5(of )0.5(the )0.5(enjoyment )0.5(of )0.5(six )0.5(new )0.5(works)-30.1( )]TJ
0.027 Tw T*
[(composed )0.5(for cochlear )0.5(implant )0.5(recipients, )0.5(where HIB\222)55.1(s )0.5(attendance)-29.8( )]TJ
0 Tw T*
[(was funded by the Harold Mitchell )18.1(T)35.3(ravelling Fellowship 2012.)]TJ
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tc 12 0 0 12 36.8504 382.7357 Tm
(REFERENCES)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.256 Tw 9 0 0 9 36.8504 368.9011 Tm
([1])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Ramsden, )0.7(R.T)74.4(., History of cochlear )1(implantation. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0 Tw 21.483 0 Td
(Cochlear )Tj
0.025 Tw -21.483 -1.222 Td
(Implants International)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
9.052 0 Td
(, 2013. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (14)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(S4\): p. 3-5.)Tj
0.306 Tw -11.572 -1.222 Td
([2])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Galvin, )0.6(J.J., Q.J. Fu, and R.V)128.7(. Shannon, Melodic )0.8(contour )]TJ
0.046 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(identification )1.2(and music perception )0.5(by cochlear )0.5(implant )0.6(users. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.015 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(Annals )0.5(of )0.5(the )0.6(New Y)91.6(ork )18.4(Academy )0.8(of )0.5(Sciences)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
17.862 0 Td
(, 2009. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw [(1)55.2(169)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.015 Tw [(\(1\): )0.5(p. )]TJ
0 Tw -17.862 -1.222 Td
(518-533.)Tj
0.09 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([3])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(McDermott)0.5(, H.J., Music percepti)0.8(on with )0.5(cochlear )1.1(implants: )1.2(a )]TJ
0 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(review)65.2(. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0.007 Tw 3.181 0 Td
[(T)55(r)37(ends )-18(in Amplification)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 9.44 0 Td
(, 2004. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (8)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(2\): p. 49-82.)Tj
-0.012 Tc -0.03 Tw -15.14 -1.222 Td
([4])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Looi, )18.4(V)128.7(. and J. She, Music perception of cochlear implant users: a)-11.9( )]TJ
0.032 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program.)-12( )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0.025 Tw T*
(International journal of audiology)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 2010. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.012 Tw (49)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw [(\(2\): p. 1)37.2(16-128.)]TJ
0 Tc 0.251 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([5])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Limb, )0.9(C.J. and J.T)74.3(. Rubinstein, )0.9(Current )0.7(research )0.8(on music )]TJ
0.086 Tw T*
[(perception )0.8(in cochlear )0.7(implant )0.8(users. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
[(Otolaryngologic )0.6(Clinics )]TJ
0.007 Tw T*
[(of )-17.8(North America)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (, 2012. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (45)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(1\): p. 129-140.)Tj
0.285 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([6])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(McDermott)0.5(, H., Music Perceptio)0.7(n, in )55.9(Auditory )0.6(Prostheses: )]TJ
0.031 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(New Horizons, )55.7(A.N.P)110.5(. Fan-Gang Zeng, Richard )0.8(R. Fay)64.9(, Editor )]TJ
0.025 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(201)37.1(1, Springer: New )36.9(Y)100(ork. p. 305-339.)]TJ
/C2_0 1 Tf
0 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
<003E001A0040>Tj
/Span<>> BDC
<0003>Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[<002A0055004800480051005A005200520047000F0003>-16.8<0027001100270011000F0003>38<0024>55<0003>-16.8<004600520046004B004F0048004400550003>-16<00490055004800540058004800510046005C0000005300520056004C0057004C005200510003>-15.8<00490058005100460057004C005200510003>-16.3<0049005200550003>]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.074 Tw T*
[(several )0.6(species\22729 )0.6(years later)55.8(. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
[(The Journal of the )18.5(Acoustical )]TJ
0.007 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(Society )-17.2(of America)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (, 1990. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (87)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(6\): p. 2592-2605.)Tj
-0.01 Tc 0.323 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([8])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Hillenbrand, )0.5(J., )0.5(et )0.6(al., )55.7(Acoustic )0.5(characteristics )0.5(of )55.7(American)-10( )]TJ
-0.001 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
(English vowels. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.019 Tw [(J Acoust )-18.4(Soc Am)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.001 Tw (, 1995. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.01 Tw (97)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.001 Tw [(\(5 Pt 1\): p. 3099-1)37.2(1)37.1(1.)]TJ
0 Tc 0.23 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([9])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Cox, F)80(., )18.5(The acoustic )1(characteristics )1.7(of/hVd/ )0.6(vowels in )0.6(the )]TJ
0.22 Tw T*
[(speech of some )54.9(Australian teenag)0.7(ers. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
(Australian Journal of )Tj
0 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
(Linguistics)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (, 2006. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (26)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(2\): p. 147-179.)Tj
0.09 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([10])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Pols, L.C., L.J. van der Kamp, and R. Plomp, Perceptual )0.5(and )]TJ
0 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(physical )0.9(space )0.6(of vowel )0.5(sounds. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.018 Tw [(J )0.6(Acoust )-17.3(Soc )0.6(Am)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0 Tw (, 1969. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(46)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(\(2\): )Tj
0.025 Tw T*
(p. 458-67.)Tj
0.027 Tw 27.724 76.356 Td
[([1)37.1(1])]TJ
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Cox, F)79.9(., )18.4(V)128.8(owel )0.7(change )0.8(in )55.7(Australian )0.9(English. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0 Tw 18.374 0 Td
(Phonetica)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.027 Tw 4.054 0 Td
(, 1996. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw -22.428 -1.222 Td
(56)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(1-2\): p. 1-27.)Tj
0.009 Tc 0.375 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
[([)9(1)9(2)9(])]TJ
/Span<>> BDC
1.666 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.854 0 Td
[(E)0.7(d)0.5(d)0.5(i)0.6(n)0.5(g)0.5(t)0.7(o)0.5(n)0.5(,)0.5( )0.5(D.)0.5(K.)0.5(,)0.5( )0.5(Sp)0.5(e)0.7(e)0.6(c)0.7(h)0.5( )0.5(d)0.5(i)0.6(sc)0.7(ri)0.7(m)0.7(i)0.6(n)0.5(a)0.7(t)0.7(i)0.6(o)0.5(n)0.5( )0.5(i)0.7(n)0.5( )0.5(d)0.5(e)0.7(a)0.6(f)0.5( )0.5(su)0.5(b)0.5(j)0.7(e)0.7(c)0.6(t)0.7(s)8.8( )]TJ
0 Tc 0.171 Tw T*
[(with cochlear )0.5(implants. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
[(Journal of the )18.3(Acoustical )0.8(Society )0.8(of )]TJ
0 Tw T*
(America)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (, 1980. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (68)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(3\): p. 885-91.)Tj
0.372 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([13])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Blamey)65.6(, P)110.7(.J., et al., )18.3(V)128.7(owel and consonant recognition )0.7(of )]TJ
0.37 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(cochlear )0.6(implant )0.7(patients )0.5(using formant-estimating )1.3(speech )]TJ
0 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
(processors. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.014 Tw 4.707 0 Td
[(Journal )0.5(of )0.5(the )18.7(Acoustica)0.6(l )0.5(Society )1.1(of )18.6(America)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 1987. )Tj
0.025 Tw -4.707 -1.222 Td
(82\(1\): p. 48-57.)Tj
0.273 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([14])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Diehl, )0.7(R.L., )55.6(A.J. Lotto, )0.9(and L.L. )0.7(Holt, )0.5(Speech )0.7(perception. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0.025 Tw T*
[(Annual r)37(eview )0.6(of psychology)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
11.618 0 Td
(, 2004. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (55)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (: p. 149-79.)Tj
0.003 Tc 0.375 Tw -14.138 -1.222 Td
[([)3(1)3(5)3(])]TJ
/Span<>> BDC
1.666 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.854 0 Td
[(Shannon, R.V)128.4(., et al., Speech recognition with primarily)3( )]TJ
0 Tc 0.025 Tw T*
[(temporal )0.8(cues. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0 Tw (Science)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 9.184 0 Td
(, 1995. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (270)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(5234\): p. 303-4.)Tj
/C2_0 1 Tf
0 Tw -11.704 -1.222 Td
<003E001400190040>Tj
/Span<>> BDC
<0003>Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[<0027005200510044004F0047005600520051000F0003>1.8<002A0011003600110003>1.4<0044005100470003>1.9<00350011002400110003>1.6<003500580057004B000F0003>1.9<002700480055004C0059004800470003>2.1<00450044005100470003>1.9<004400580047004C005700520055005C0003>2.2<004500550044004C00510000>]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.03 Tw T*
[(stem )0.5(response estimates )0.6(of traveling)0.8( wave velocity )0.9(in humans. )]TJ
0.31 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(I: Normal-hearing)0.6( subjects. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
[(The Journal of the )18.1(Acoustical )]TJ
0.007 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(Society )-17.2(of America)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (, 1993. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (93)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(2\): p. 940-951.)Tj
0.003 Tc 0.375 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
[([)3(1)3(7)3(])]TJ
/Span<>> BDC
1.666 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.854 0 Td
[(Sha)0.6(nn)0.5(on, )0.5(R.)0.5(V)129.1(.)0.5(, Mul)0.6(t)0.6(i)0.6(c)0.6(ha)0.6(nn)0.5(e)0.6(l)0.6( e)0.6(l)0.6(e)0.6(c)0.5(t)0.6(r)0.5(i)0.6(c)0.6(a)0.5(l)0.6( )0.5(st)0.6(i)0.6(m)0.6(u)0.5(l)0.6(a)0.6(t)0.5(i)0.7(on o)0.5(f t)0.6(h)0.5(e)3.1( )]TJ
0.008 Tc T*
(auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.008 Tw [(Hearing)8( )]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw T*
[(Resear)37.3(ch)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (, 1983. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (12)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(1\): p. 1-16.)Tj
0.348 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([18])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(V)110.7(andali, )56.2(A.E., et )0.7(al., )0.7(Speech )0.7(perception )1.1(as a )0.6(function )0.8(of )]TJ
0.352 Tw T*
[(electrical )1.6(stimula)0.6(tion )0.5(rate: )0.8(using the )0.5(Nucleus 24 cochlear )]TJ
0.025 Tw T*
[(implant )0.8(system. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
(Ear and hearing)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 2000. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (21)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(6\): p. 608-24.)Tj
0.052 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([19])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(T)70(aft, D.A., D.B. Grayden, and )55.3(A.N. Burkitt, )55.8(Across-frequency )]TJ
0.041 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(delays based on the cochlear )0.9(traveli)0.8(ng wave: enhanced )0.7(speech )]TJ
0.086 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(presentation )1.1(for cochlear )0.9(implants. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
14.477 0 Td
[(IEEE )0.8(transactions )0.5(on bio-)]TJ
0.025 Tw -14.477 -1.222 Td
[(medical )0.5(engineering)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
8.217 0 Td
(, 2010. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (57)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(3\): p. 596-606.)Tj
0.065 Tw -10.737 -1.222 Td
([20])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Gfeller)40.5(, K., et al., )55.2(Accuracy of Cochlear implant )0.6(recipients )0.5(on )]TJ
0.074 Tw T*
[(pitch perception, )0.7(melody recognition, )0.7(and speech reception )0.8(in )]TJ
0 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
(noise. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 2.636 0 Td
(Ear and Hearing)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 2007. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (28)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(3\): p. 412-423.)Tj
0.082 Tw -5.156 -1.222 Td
([21])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Leal, M.C., et al., Music perception )0.5(in adult cochlear )0.6(implant )]TJ
0 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
(recipients. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 4.412 0 Td
[(Acta )0.5(Otolaryngol)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 2003. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (123)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(7\): p. 826-35.)Tj
0.071 Tw -6.932 -1.222 Td
([22])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Fujita, )0.6(S. and J. Ito, )55.4(Ability )0.6(of nucleus cochlear )0.8(implantees )1.1(to )]TJ
-0.008 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(recognize )0.6(music. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
(Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 1999. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (108)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.008 Tw (\(7 Pt 1\): )Tj
0.025 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
(p. 634-40.)Tj
0.24 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([23])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Looi, )18.1(V)128.7(. and J. She, Music perception of cochlear implant )]TJ
0.011 Tw T*
[(users: a questionnaire, )0.5(and its impli)0.7(cations )0.5(for a music training )]TJ
0 Tw T*
(program. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0.007 Tw 3.913 0 Td
[(Int )-17.8(J Audiol)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 4.753 0 Td
(, 2010. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (49)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw [(\(2\): p. 1)37.1(16-28.)]TJ
0.001 Tc 0.375 Tw -11.186 -1.222 Td
[([)1(2)1(4)1(])]TJ
/Span<>> BDC
1.666 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
0.854 0 Td
[(G)-0.6(feller)39.6(, K)-0.6(., et al., )17.6(The ef)17.6(fects of musical and linguistic)1.2( )]TJ
0 Tc 0.122 Tw T*
[(components )0.9(in )0.7(recognition )1.1(of )0.5(real-)0.5(world musical )1.1(excerpts )0.9(by )]TJ
-0.001 Tw T*
[(cochlear )0.9(implant )1(recipients )1(and normal-hearing )1(adults. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
22.068 0 Td
(J Music )Tj
0 Tw -22.068 -1.222 Td
(Ther)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (, 2012. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tw (49)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(1\): p. 68-101.)Tj
0.058 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([25])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Gfeller)40.5(, K., et )0.5(al., )18.6(The )0.6(impact )1(of voice )0.7(range )0.5(and instrumental )]TJ
0.054 Tw T*
[(background accom)0.6(paniment )0.9(on recognition )0.6(of song lyrics. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0 Tw (7th )Tj
0.216 Tw T*
(Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implants and Related )Tj
0 Tw T*
(Sciences)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 3.442 0 Td
(, 2009: p. 42-46.)Tj
0.312 Tw -5.962 -1.222 Td
([26])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Allegro, S., M. B\374chler)40.5(, and S. Launer)55.7(. )54.9(Automatic )0.6(sound )]TJ
0.121 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(classification )0.9(inspired by auditory scene analysis. in )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
[(Pr)37.1(oc. of )]TJ
0.246 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(EUROSPEECH 2001, 7th Eur)37.1(opean Confer)37.3(ence on Speech )]TJ
0.025 Tw T*
[(Communication and T)91.7(echnology)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
13.012 0 Td
[(, 2001, )55.2(Aalbor)18.2(g, Denmark)]TJ
0.313 Tw -15.532 -1.222 Td
([27])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Laneau, )0.9(J., J. )18.2(W)80.2(outers, and M. Moonen, Improved )0.6(music )]TJ
0.268 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(perception )0.5(with explicit )0.6(pitch coding in cochlear )0.5(implants. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 0 -1.222 TD
[(Audiology )0.6(and Neur)37.1(otology)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
11.123 0 Td
(, 2006. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-0.055 Tc 0.055 Tw (11)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0.025 Tw 3.995 0 Td
(\(1\): p. 38-52.)Tj
-0.01 Tc 0.152 Tw -17.637 -1.222 Td
([28])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(V)110.7(andali, )55(A.E., et al., Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant)-9.8( )]TJ
0.015 Tw T*
(recipients: a comparison of sound-processing strategies. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0.01 Tw [(Journal)-9.8( )]TJ
0.025 Tw T*
[(of the )18.1(Acoustical Society of )18.1(America)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 2005. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-0.065 Tc 0.065 Tw [(11)-55.1(7)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.01 Tc 0.025 Tw 18.637 0 Td
(\(5\): p. 3126-38.)Tj
0 Tc 0.204 Tw -21.157 -1.222 Td
([29])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Grayden, )0.5(D.B., et )0.8(al. )55.9(A)55( cochlear )1.2(implant )1.3(speech )0.7(processing )]TJ
0.337 Tw T*
[(strategy )1(based )0.6(on )0.5(an )0.7(auditory )1(model. )]TJ
/TT2 1 Tf
16.987 0 Td
[(Pr)37.1(oc. )0.7(of )0.6(Intelligent )]TJ
0.015 Tc -0.015 Tw -16.987 -1.222 Td
[(Se)0.6(nsors)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0.535 Tw 4.278 0 Td
[(Se)0.6(nsor N)0.5(e)0.5(t)0.6(work)0.5(s and)0.5( Inf)0.6(ormat)0.6(i)0.5(o)0.5(n)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0.015 Tc -0.015 Tw 16.388 0 Td
[(P)0.6(r)37.3(oc)0.6(e)0.6(ssi)0.6(ng)15( )]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw -20.667 -1.222 Td
[(Confer)37.3(ence)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw ( 2004. Melbourne.)Tj
-0.03 Tc 0.045 Tw -2.52 -1.222 Td
([30])Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.52 0 Td
[(Li, X., et al., Improved perception of music with a harmonic based)-30( )]TJ
0.015 Tw T*
[(algorithm for cochlear implants. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation)-30( )]TJ
0.03 Tw T*
(Engineering, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0.025 Tw 5.022 0 Td
[(IEEE T)55(ransactions)]TJ
/TT0 1 Tf
( on, 2013. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.03 Tw (21)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.025 Tw (\(4\): p. 684-694.)Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>/Subtype/Form>>stream
0 0 0 1 K
0.5 w 4 M 0 j 0 J
/GS0 gs
q 1 0 0 1 35.7166 62.128 cm
0 0 m
522.85 0 l
S
Q
endstream
endobj
20 0 obj
<>/Subtype/Form>>stream
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>stream
H\J@{6ٝQ*>@lkn6ۻ'GNff h7[?}O96ټ0m?Os,O菛ﳪ2[Z5zM>mٴi/7i_e𦘞i֟Ut-LECo*g@lnWxM^K֗/9 `%kb[K#;-|G/K0,,,,,#9=<%[0}|aAaAaAaAMDWW.żrO3 0 0 0 2"YtV8+JgYtV8+=
C3=t
6NGeWLji]e Fۢ
endstream
endobj
51 0 obj
<>stream
HXY@"(:t@UVL u {zUAETkAOĄQs`ża}UWIS&D